Burris 3-9x 40mm Fullfield Ii Plex Rifle Scope Reviews
This is an older review of a Burris scope that was one of the earlier scopes to comprise a BDC into the reticle.
Burris Optics has a reputation of making good quality scopes right here in the USA. I decided to perform a review on one of their newer scopes that they have been pushing hard. I was originally looking for a 6x40mm scope suitable for tactical utilise. I ended up getting a Fullfield 2 3-9x40mm with the ballistic plex reticule.
The Fullfield II line of scopes is Burris' mainstream line of scopes. The Signature series is their flagship/high end line of scopes. If you lot go straight off the spec canvas, the Fullfield II line of scopes appears to be a bargain. They claim 95% low-cal manual, Nitrogen filled (purged and filled 24 times), lifetime (forever) warranty, and "quad seals" vs. O-rings. I'm not sure if quad rings is amend then O-rings, or if purging and filling the tube 24 times makes a difference, simply what I exercise know is that the quality of drinking glass that I look through with this scope is excellent!
Kickoff, the optics. The bodily clarity of the scope and light transmission is on par with scopes of much higher price. Comparison straight with a Leupold Mk4 M3 10x, the clarity is not quite as adept across the whole spectrum, simply it is not far behind either. It is much amend than other $200-$300 scopes. The light gathering is excellent, the specs say it has 95% light transmission with these lenses, and to get to that level with other manufacturers, yous have to crash-land upward to their peak of the line scopes. During an early on morning evaluation (hour before dominicus up) I compared it once more side past side with the Leupold Mk4. The light gathering was nearly on par with the top of the line Leupold. Both were excellent and the slightly ameliorate clarity of the Leupold seemed to help the perception of light gathering to put it ahead of the Burris. In terms of optics quality, the Burris performed very well.
The Fullfield 2 comes with lens caps, only its a single unit that covers both lenses (see film above). Its adequate for storage, simply I would rather accept Butler Creek flip ups, and I volition be getting some shortly.
The windage and elevation adjustments are mitt tunable, but are not target knobs. They are designed then they can be read while behind the scope, which is prissy, but I have withal to find a way to "slip" the turrets one time zeroed, which is preferred for tactical utilize. The adjustments are crisp with both feel and audio clicks. I have notwithstanding to have whatever problems with the adjustments, I merely wish they were more of a target turret mode, even a low profile design would work. Combined with the ballistic plex, the adjustments work well enough. These adjustments are steel on steel, which is past far the preferred mode. Some articles utilise brass or nylon, and these softer materials wear out and the adjustments lose their precision over time. Steel lasts much better.
I specifically chose the ballistic plex reticule in gild to test the feasibility of using this reticule in a tactical environment. The idea of the reticule is simple. Only create marks that stand for bullet path at 100,200,300,400 and 500 yards. The hard part is picking WHICH bullet path to match! Burris has selected a path that gets close to as many loads as possible. For serious long range shooting, ane would have to and then record the verbal differences your particular load would have vs. the reticule. i.e. At 200 yards yous may have to get up 1 click, at 300 upwardly 4 clicks at 400 only up 2 clicks. Etc. Is it ideal? No, it is not, but it drastically reduces your comeup adjustments, and in a pinch, only shooting at the proper tick marking will get you pretty dang close on the target for your chosen load. I mounted the telescopic on a .223, and I chose the standard 55gr FMJ-BT bullet (M193) and the reticule matches the flight very well, and this held upwardly in long-range trials. Of course, the reticule just adjusts you out to 500 yards. Across that, no joy. This fits the .223 very well, as information technology is no practiced across 500 anyway. My overall impression is that this reticule is ideally suited to constabulary enforcement use, where typical shots are sub 100 yards where you lot could zero the telescopic as you would normally, but yet the reticule would be useful in those rare occasions where you lot would demand to appoint farther out, beyond where yous usually exercise.
To conclude, I am impressed with the Fullfield II iii-nine scope, and I plan to further try out some other models in the time to come. I have no reservations recommending this scope for use. I'd prefer target knobs, and one nice thing well-nigh Burris, is yous can ship in your scope and $80 and they volition put target knobs on information technology. This is possible with any of the Burris scopes. I may yet end up doing this with this scope. The optical quality was a pleasant surprise and the scopes are well made.
Source: https://www.snipercentral.com/burris-fullfield-ii-3-9x40mm/
0 Response to "Burris 3-9x 40mm Fullfield Ii Plex Rifle Scope Reviews"
Post a Comment